Search for: "Michigan Bell Telephone Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 6:31 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Co. and Isiogu v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co., No. 10-313. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:45 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Co. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:26 am
Telecommunications Entrance facilities To satisfy its duty under 47 U.S.C. 251(c)(2), an incumbent LEC must make its existing entrance facilities available to competitors at cost-based rates if the facilities are to be used for interconnection. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:43 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Company, 267 F.R.D. 213 (E.D.MI.)). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Co., Justice Scalia raises concerns about so-called “Auer deference,” under which Courts grant agencies Chevron–like deference to agency interpretations of their own regulations.It is comforting to know that I would reach the Court’s result even without Auer. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Co, 284 Mich App 581, (2009). [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 7:22 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Co., through Decker v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:15 am
MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. 10-329 ISIOGU, ORJIAKOR, ET AL. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 7:14 pm
MI Bell Tele Co Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitBOYCE F. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 1:43 pm
Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. (2012), the defendant employer terminated the plaintiff employee for disability fraud following an FMLA leave. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:02 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Co., No. 10-313. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:26 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Company, 10–329, CA6, presents the questions (1) whether the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Federal Communications Commission’s Triennial Review Remand Order permit incumbent local telephone companies to charge competing telephone companies rates for entrance facilities used for interconnection; and (2) whether the lower court provided the appropriate level of deference to the FCC’s interpretation of its… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 10-329, which present the same question and were argued on March 30. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Co., Justice Thomas wrote for a unanimous Court, holding that “The FCC has advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regula-tions—i.e., that to satisfy its duty under §251(c)(2), an incumbent LEC must make its existing entrance facilities available to competi-tors at cost-based rates if the facilities are to be used for interconnec-tion—and this Court defers to the FCC’s views. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 564 U. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:17 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Co., a federal judge conditionally certified a class of workers who claim they are owed overtime as a result of being misclassified as “exempt”. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
President, after a demonstration of Alexander Bell's telephone, 1877. [read post]
